qilo wins 2019 Raising Star & Premium Usability Award from FinancesOnline!

We’re all incredibly proud of what we accomplished at qilo in the last 3 years, and our latest honor gives us even more reason to celebrate.

qilo has earned the prestigious 2019 Raising Star and Premium Usability Award from FinancesOnline, a popular B2B software review platform. This recognition is given out annually to products that provide outstanding solutions for B2B companies across a number of categories.

With an overall review score of 8.0 out of 10, and a user satisfaction score of 100% at the time of this writing, qilo was also honored in FinancesOnline’s new list of the Top 500 OKR Software market leaders and list of best 20 best project management software for enterprises

In evaluating qilo for the 2019 Raising Star and Premium Usability Award, FinancesOnline’s team of software experts examined and compared qilo against its competitors in various scenarios. Some of the specific criteria that their review team took into account were:

  • qilo range of “key OKR functionalities,” combined with a simple and intuitive interface
  • The collaborative nature of qilo’s ability to create team-based OKR’s
  • The capacity to forecast execution against defined Key Results
  • Email integration from multiple apps and services
  • The ability of 1-on-1 guidance and quarterly OKR progress reviews
  • Cascade Annual Operating Plan and Strategic Projects using 1 software
  • Business Vision and Organization Values Alignment
  • Continuous feedback execution loops

According to a FinancesOnline statement released to qilo, “Experts have seen qilo OKR perform impeccably for mid-size to large teams. It is an awesome product that a CEO can implement to Driving results on company objectives.”

We’re delighted to have a shiny new award to put on the qilo mantle, but more importantly, the 2019 Raising Star and Premium Usability Award is another confirmation that at qilo we are committed to help CEO’s and companies drive execution on company strategic objectives and help them accelerate growth.

Please visit FinancesOnline.com to post your own review of qilo, and thanks for your support through another amazing year.

About the industry awards received

FinancesOnline recognized qilo with two industry awards in the top enterprise project management software space for its exceptional usability as well as its consistent market growth and customer reception. The review platform noted a highly positive user feedback through its Customer Satisfaction Algorithm, with Qilo garnering 141 positive social mentions and no negative social mentions at all. This allowed us to win the Rising Star award for 2019. Furthermore, the software experts found all available Qilo features to be quite user-friendly and intuitive, thus allowing us to be distinguished with the Premium Usability title.

Keep visiting qilotech.com to check what’s in store for 2019!

Building the Execution Culture!

When we started qilo’s journey, we had one single focus and agenda. How can we help companies perform better! During this journey, we met hundreds of leaders across industries and geographies. Did research with over 5000 people – Here are some learning’s from the experiences we got;

Execution Accountability

One theme, which clearly emerged as inputs from the leaders, was execution accountability. On an average a management team invests thousands of critical man-hours in boardroom/ meeting rooms, the question to be asked, are they genuinely productive?

Over 90% of the respondents we asked this question said no. So what could be the reason?

  • Lack of belief/ Clarity in the Vision
  • Limited say in creating the plan
  • Fear of conflicts
  • Yes Minister Syndrome
  • PTB- Passing the buck
  • Limited know how

Recently there has been a trend in companies that divide the workforce into 2 buckets – Planners and Doers. In some companies, they work as a team and in some still hierarchal. Depending on their culture, I have categories them as following types

  • The Houdini’sType – This team pops up while creating an annual plan and asks for data from across functions and post creation of the plan does a vanishing act. And to be seen during the review meeting sometimes. These type of companies build 2 classes amongst team (unknowingly) the corporate and rest of others.
  • Living on the edge Type– these are a set of companies, who do not believe in strategic planning or vision and find it a waste of time. (Believe me, they do exist and in masses.) These companies focus on a month-to-month plan with no strategic vision. Some of them pretend to be non-conformist (Strategy Atheist) but deep inside they lack know how at a leadership level.
  • King with the golden robe Type– These are set of companies where decision making resides in one corner office. Whether the company is doing well, bad is decided upon which side of the bed the king woke up from. The companies are highly perception and ego driven. The single focus for the teams is to please the king.
  • The Change Makers– they are a group of people closely aligned with the purpose and leaders vision. They fail together and succeed together. These companies align their teams with their purpose first and the drive execution accountability. They work in a network of teams and the leadership team rolls us the sleeve whenever required and run the shop floor.

Globally, the shelf lives of companies are getting shorter and shorter. Product Power and Proprietary Power will not just be enough. The key differentiator of a company will be the way you work and get the Strategy Execution done.

Always remember the pace and the quality of execution will decide if your team is working for you or your competitor!

 

 

 

OKR Design Patterns For Successful Implementation

design pattern is a general repeatable solution to a commonly occurring problem. In the context of OKR (Objective & Key Results)  many companies fail at the implementation stage as to how to arrange the OKR’s in a way that can lead to successful implementation and adoption of the framework.

This challenge will come to you when you have understood the basics of OKR and probably have read a couple of books and articles on the subjective. When implementing the OKR in your company, you need to remember that the organization is not made of different parts and pieces but it’s a complex adaptive system. And this system is run by people who have different motives and need to be satisfied at gut, mind and heart level. Any change we bring into the system needs to be carefully thought through.

The question here we are trying to answer is how you will arrange the OKR’s in your hierarchical complex system. There are 4 basic design patterns which can be applied to implement OKR’s

  1. Silo Pattern
  2. Team-based OKR Pattern
  3. Top-to-bottom flow pattern
  4. Top-3-level flow pattern

1. Silo Pattern: Each individual owns the objective and all the keys results are owned by the objective owner herself. Its simple to implement and easy to modify but again encourages silos in the company.

OKR

2. Team-Based OKR Pattern: Its different from silo pattern in a way that the Key Result are either owned by (a) objective owner reports(team members working under objective manager). Or the Key Result are owned by someone else working under a different manager,  but working with the Objective owner to achieve that Objective.

3. Top-to-bottom Cascade Pattern: In explaining this pattern (which means a way to arrange OKR’s) I am assuming that your company has 4 level hierarchy. This OKR design pattern connects the top level execution agenda with the bottom level execution. This means that the agenda of execution is cascaded down till the last mile of the company. But it also assumes that most of the execution is taken care by the bottom layer of the company.

OKR

4. Top-3-level Cascade Pattern: Again assuming that your company has 4 level hierarchy. In this OKR pattern, we connect top 3 levels of the company and cascading stops at the 3rd level of the company. And the 4th level will have their OKR’s based on silo pattern. It is based on the understanding that if the top 3 levels of the company are in sync then we will have a better flow of the agenda.

OKR

If you are struggling to implement the OKR successfully, we will be happy to have a conversation with you and help you in achieving success in OKR implementation. Feel free to drop mail talk[at]qilotech[dot]com

 

Preparing your company for next level of growth

As a CEO/Founder, you have already taken your company from point A to point B. You have survived the initial 2 to 5 years of journey to build a company. Now you clearly understand what kind of people will be able to work with you and in your company, and most importantly you are revenue positive too.

Now it time to scale your company and take it from point B to point C. And this kind of scaling comes with its own kind of challenges. It’s the time you must bring in more experts inside your company especially at the leadership and mid-managerial positions. And most importantly, allow them to run the show on your behalf. Since people will be executing things on your behalf and you will move from PUSH to PULL mode of execution, you must invest heavily in the organization, people efficiency & effectiveness. The 3 most important work areas for you apart from arranging capital to support execution are

  1. Hiring right kind of people.
  2. Constantly aligning People beyond Leadership with your Strategic and Annual Business Plan.
  3. Investing in people efficiency and effectiveness.

1. Hiring right kind of people

Hiring the right people is the core of every business. It makes sense to outsource your hiring if you choose to remain small. To grow your business from point B to C, you need more people.

It starts with investing in the right kind of talent acquisition team who will be in charge of hiring the right people for you.  And making sure your existing people are accountable for hiring the right people. And make your talent acquisition team accountable for hiring the people with right kind of behaviors.

The first step of hiring the right kind of people is to create the data-driven process of hiring. You create the Interview Score Cards which are easy to be understood by employees who are hiring on your behalf. These interview scorecards are created for each department separately.  Even if you don’t want to score people, just identify the required skills and required behaviors specific to your company and mark it yes and no.

Interview Scorecard

Skill/Competency Score by

Team member 1

Score by

Team member 2

Skill-1
Skill-2
Skill-3
Skill-4
Behaviors
Behavior – 1
Behavior – 2
Behavior – 3
Behavior – 4

 

Example : Hiring a Sales Manager

Skill/Competency Score by

Team member 1

Score by

Team member 2

Ability to hiring the Sales People
Ability to train the new Sales People
Ability to pitch the product/service with clarity
Negotiation Skills
Ability to Build Relationships
Behaviours
Realistic and Rational
Open Minded/Open to Change
Ability to Learn new things
Disciplined to the core
  1. Constantly aligning People beyond Leadership with your Strategic and Annual Business Plan

Probably Strategic Business Plan and Annual Business Plan(also called Annual Operating Plan) are big jargonish words for you. Many first-time entrepreneurs & CEO’s don’t understand them, and many feel that it’s a corporate company thing.

Strategic Business Plan(SBP) is about what you as the founder(s) & CEO want to achieve in next 3 to 5 years. Its about what point “C” looks like. If you don’t want to put in detailed SBP, you can simply put in place 3 to 5 statements indicating what as a company you want to achieve in the next 3 to 5 years. Draft these statements and get these statements validated by your leadership team.

Annual Business Plan(Also called Annual Operating Plan) is about how as a company you have to performance in a particular financial year to meet your Strategic Business Plan. Many companies break down their revenue targets till sales executive level and think they are done with it.

And many do create a plan beyond achieving sales number during their annual offsite; but post that CEO struggles to see the action plan and execution on that action plan. Here is a quick step-by-step process to set your Annual Operating Plan and to make sure execution happen on that plan.

  1. Before annual offsite, share the 3 to 5 statements that describe what needs to be achieved in that financial year. These 3 to 5 statements should be linked(aligned) with your strategic business priorities.
  2. Validate these annual priority statements with your team before going to onsite.
  3. While you are preparing for the offsite,  ask the team now to come up with 1 to 5 projects & goals for the next 3 to 6 months that will help the company to achieve these annual priorities.
  4. During the offsite, the entire leadership team validates those projects. And put in place the action plan & milestones to achieve those projects & goals.
  5. Post offsite, leadership team discuss, validate and correct these projects with their respective teams. And put this plan in action for execution.

Though this sounds simple, making sure that the team remain focused on drafting the projects and milestones to achieve those projects. You need to put a person in charge who will own this entire end to end process & activity. Usually, this person has a very good understanding of your business horizontally and to whom rest of the team members will listen to.

Frameworks like Objective and Key Results (OKR)  can help you in achieving how to creating the strategic and annual plan and how to link people and execution with this plan.

  1. Investing in people efficiency and effectiveness

This is the part where most of the CEO fails to do a good job. And end up hiring the team of consultants/guru who end up giving you ready to eat meals which probably don’t work for your company. Organization effectiveness and efficiency is majorly about:

  • 3. a) Properly defining the business KPI’s & Projects to achieve your achieve your Annual Business Plan.And then making sure execution happens on to achieve those KPIs and Projects.
  • 3.b) Investing in tools that enhance productivity and get work done.
  • 3.c) Enhancing leadership capabilities through training or workshops

3.a) Properly define the business KPI’s and Project:

Most employees hate taking accountability towards what needs to be achieved by them in a company. And most managers take the decision of who is making progress and who is not based on perception; not on data. When the company invest time in setting up the process to define KPI’s and projects to achieve execution properly, it enhancing decision making, transparency from top to bottom and reduces biases between teams and across the company.

3.b) Investing in processes and tools to enhance productivity: The next question to answer is what kind of tools are required by employees so that it can enhance & accelerate the execution on business KPI’s and Projects to be executed. Many companies invest time in drafting a plan, but only a few invest time and resources in making sure that the plan gets executed. At company level you primarily need 3 kinds of tools :

  • One that enhances execution on your Business KPI’s and Projects. Example: CRM’s, Project Management tools, Goal-setting tools, Task management tools.
  • Second is that help the company in enhancing customer centricity. Example: Tools to measure customer satisfaction, tools to listen to customer voice/opinions and tools to provide awesome customer support.
  • Third are tools that reduce administrative work. Example: Financial Support Systems, HRMS etc.

Not all listed tools are required immediately. You need to decide which tools are more important and which can be implemented later. Another important point here is, many of these tool implementations fail for many companies. This happens because of many reasons. I am listing down few of them for you:

  • Company is not able to define the requirement clearly and you end up buying something which doesn’t fulfill your need.
  • An Owner and internal champions are not defined who is responsible for successful implementation.
  • Vendor is not helping the company to identify their requirements.
  • Company doesn’t go into the detail on evaluating the tool in detail and don ask the right question.
  • A UAT (User Acceptance testing) is not done properly against the requirement before rolling out to the larger audience.
  • Not leveraging vendor expertise in implementing solution successfully.
  • Owner of implementation is more bothered about her learning from the implementation than successful implementation.

3.c) Enhancing your leadership capabilities through training or workshops

The first few training or brainstorming sessions you need to invest are in:

  • Visioning Workshops
  • Team Alignment workshop
  • Building accountability across company workshop

Visioning: In a 1996 HBR article, James Collins and Jerry Porras showed that companies with a strong sense of vision had outperformed the others in the stock market by a factor of 12 since 1925! Vision reflects what we care most about and is derived from our sense of purpose and values. It provides meaning, attracts commitment, and focuses human energy by drawing on our deepest yearnings in striving towards a purposeful goal. Visions provide a clear, easily understood image of a better future. Strong visions inspire employees. They embody values & behaviors, provide people in the company the purpose, and direct them to what will be different and distinctive.

Team Alignment : The biggest challenge we have seen while implementing qilo is that of alignment towards the annual and long-term goals of the company. A simple test of this is to “ask your employees what are the 3 to 4 things the company wants to achieve in this financial year”.  Almost 80% people in the company fail to answer this. This is CEO and leadership failure, not employee failure. With alignment workshop, focus on communicating what company wants to achieve and help people align their work with CEO’s agenda.

Accountability workshop: Accountability means I will deliver the expected results from me, come what may. I will collaborate with people across teams and will not wait to be lead by someone to get work done. Building the behavior of accountability is far more difficult. And that the reason companies prefer people from top institutes and people with the excellent academic record because it shows that the likelihood of this person being accountable for execution is very high. But every company doesn’t have access to these people, and the best way to build this behavior is to constantly communicate about the importance of the same across the company.

Summary

  1. Invest in setting up the strong process and people who hire on your behalf.
  2. State your strategic business priorities in 3 to 5 statements.
  3. Draft 3 to 5 statements that will summarize your annual business plan. And link these statements with your strategic business plan statements.
  4. Invest in enhancing your leadership capabilities. And invest to set up processes and tool to enhance people productivity.

Too busy for Strategic Thinking and Execution?

In one of the articles published in HBR -96% of leaders believe that strategic thinking and execution will help them grow.

Then what is the reason for not investing time in?

My 2 cents;

  • Integration of Strategic Execution with Daily ops. At business we follow various review mechanisms daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly etc. but with what agenda? We normally discuss, what we all know and pass the buck to the less informed. This agenda distorts the larger picture. Strategy execution is a process that does not work like instant noodles. Ensure that during the reviews ask for progress on strategic projects and set accountability in execution for the same and remember at every instance keep on reiterating the Larger purpose and picture.

 

  • Fear of conflicts – Every leader wants to be liked by all and try’s avoids conflicts with peers and subordinates. Who will bell the cat? Why should I spoil my relationship? Keeps on popping up at the subconscious levels. While framing a strategic plan or monitoring execution someone has to ask tough questions! Do not let your team be a mutual admiration society. Do not let the fear of conflicts affect the growth agenda of the organisation.

 

  • I am too busy syndrome– in organisations, if you don’t act busy; you are perceived not to contributing to the business. Our calendars are packed like vacation bags (where do I find additional space). Hundred of mails to respond, of which 90% of them are in CC. Take a deep breath, and ask how many of them are relevant? The reality is we just don’t want to step out of our comfort i.e. daily execution and think and answer what we are executing, is it contributing to the larger picture?

 

  • Gap between thinkers and doers. Many organisations have this funny thing, create the strategy plan without consulting with people who are executing it. And then the entire year the executors focus will be to tell how shoddy the plan is and the reason why it cannnot be achieved. While the creators keeps on harping on the incapability of teams teams to execute the desired. And the CEO sitting in the corner tearing his hair apart … funny isn’t it.

 

  • Unable to answer what is in it for me – The most difficult question that the CEO has to address to the team members is what’s in it for me is it Money, Gratification, Growth? Or it’s something else like connecting them with your purpose and making them part of achieving it. Do not have the answer, let’s not discuss this.

 

  • The big C – Culture eats strategy for breakfast lunch and dinner. If your orgnisation is suffring from a traders syndrom you need to act fast and like NOW! If your teams belive that creating a stategy execultion plan is a checklist then you will never be able to achive growth. It is a business imparitive that you build a culture, which creates, compete, controls and collaborates. How? in the next blog .. till them happy reading ..

Next time someone when comes to discuss the large agenda or have a plan – take out time to discuss and give importance !! Even if it is crap, appreciate the behavior of people taking initiatives.

https://www.qilotech.com/strategic-planning-and-execution-software

 

 

Biggest Mistaking in OKR Implementation: Cascading OKR

One of the biggest reasons for failed OKR(Objective & Key Results) implementation is Cascading OKR’s. Cascading means your Line of Business(LOB) Head Key Results becomes the Objectives for the reports of LOB Head. And then the flow of cascading goes own till the last mile in the company. It looks something like this:

OKR Cascading

The 3 major flaws with Cascading OKR’s

  1. If your OKR cycle is quarterly, which means you create and close OKR’s every quarter, then you end up spending too much time going top-to-bottom. What if the cascaded OKR ownership needs to be changed? In 90 days, deciding your OKR’s and then cascading means you end up your entire time in cascading than execution.
  2. Cascading means CXO’s and Managers are not owning any Key Result, which means they are not executing anything. But that’s not true in the real world and should not be true. If that’s what you want to implement, then you are again promoting hierarchy in your company.
  3. Deciding which Key Result to cascade and which to not is not always clear.

We at qilo,  have learned it in a hard way after many implementations. Clients want Cascading, and we have given them what they want. But at the end, any OKR Software success depends on the OKR implementation and adoption by the people who will execute those OKR’s.

That’s why we at qilo, have focused more on 2 things for successful OKR implementation:

A.  Aligning OKR’s with CEO’s Annual Operating Plan or Strategic Initiatives. This approach is bi-directional and works wonderfully. It gives clarity to CEO and his team that as an organization, where we are going, and how we are doing. And for an employee working below the CXO level, it gives them clarity of how they are connected with the big picture. The only trick here is to successfully come up with the set of 3 to 5 business priority statements that don’t overlap and clearly linked with what company wants to achieve in that financial year.

B. Creating Team-based OKR’s: Rather than cascading, create the team-based OKR’s where Key Results are owned by multiple people. These KR’s go beyond the hierarchies and departments.  The concept is bit more difficult to digest at first, as managers want to hold their boundaries and don’t want people coming from different teams and hierarchy coming directly to their OKR’s.  But it beautifully solves the problem of cross-functional communications and collaborations. Mind you, this needs a bit of change management to occur.CEO and/or COO himself has to take the ownership of communicating why we are doing this.

Summary

  1. Cascading OKR’s results in wasting too much time setting OKR’s.
  2. For successful implementation, Align OKR’s with company’s Annual Operating Priorities or Long-term Strategic Priorities.
  3. Creating a team-based OKR’s aligned with the company’s priorities results in better team communication and collaboration.